| The Baby Bombers | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Daniel S
Posts : 113 Age : 32 Join date : 2009-12-30
| Subject: The Baby Bombers Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:15 pm | |
| will Matthew Knights baby bombers rise and become premiership threats within the next few years? They made the finals this year but got embarassingly eliminated by Adelaide, can they take it up a gear and become premiership contenders? | |
|
| |
Chris L
Posts : 130 Age : 32 Join date : 2009-12-30
| Subject: Re: The Baby Bombers Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:20 pm | |
| i think so but its all down to their confidence they were wiped by veteran players that have been in the AFL for a few years.
the moment they get their footing i see them as a top contender for the flag in 2010 - 2013 | |
|
| |
Falcon95
Posts : 161 Age : 28 Join date : 2009-12-29
| Subject: Re: The Baby Bombers Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:54 am | |
| They won't be for the flag until 2012 | |
|
| |
Chris L
Posts : 130 Age : 32 Join date : 2009-12-30
| Subject: Re: The Baby Bombers Thu Dec 31, 2009 9:28 am | |
| well their coach did scrape them into the finals this year just to get the living crap belted out of them by the Crows, i think it will come as a wake up call for them to take it up a gear and train extra hard for 2010 | |
|
| |
Daniel S
Posts : 113 Age : 32 Join date : 2009-12-30
| Subject: Re: The Baby Bombers Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:19 am | |
| i can see them gradually getting better each year i actually have them 6th this year, and i reckon the year after they might make the 4 | |
|
| |
Hawthorn2010
Posts : 29 Age : 33 Join date : 2009-12-30
| Subject: Re: The Baby Bombers Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:31 am | |
| Bombers still have alot of young players who need to step up there game. I see them being contenders in about 3-6 years. | |
|
| |
Chris L
Posts : 130 Age : 32 Join date : 2009-12-30
| Subject: Re: The Baby Bombers Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:15 am | |
| - Hawthorn2010 wrote:
- Bombers still have alot of young players who need to step up there game. I see them being contenders in about 3-6 years.
I agree what they did this year was get over confident | |
|
| |
jamie
Posts : 50 Age : 30 Join date : 2009-12-31
| Subject: Re: The Baby Bombers Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:32 am | |
| they wont be contenders until about 2012, they lost a few veterans last year and they will be about 11th next year. | |
|
| |
Chris L
Posts : 130 Age : 32 Join date : 2009-12-30
| Subject: Re: The Baby Bombers Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:08 pm | |
| - jamie wrote:
- they wont be contenders until about 2012, they lost a few veterans last year and they will be about 11th next year.
Maybe Only Time will tell. | |
|
| |
EIMERS !!!
Posts : 55 Age : 33 Join date : 2010-01-03
| Subject: Re: The Baby Bombers Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:16 pm | |
| Tough to predict how the Bombers will go in 2010, are the real unknowns of 2010, could finish 5th - 10th | |
|
| |
Falcon95
Posts : 161 Age : 28 Join date : 2009-12-29
| Subject: Re: The Baby Bombers Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:59 pm | |
| 8th however its only gunna be a 7 team comp like last year | |
|
| |
Daniel S
Posts : 113 Age : 32 Join date : 2009-12-30
| Subject: Re: The Baby Bombers Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:23 am | |
| essendon in 2010 are gonna be one of those teams where you dunno what could happen, unpredictable. | |
|
| |
EIMERS !!!
Posts : 55 Age : 33 Join date : 2010-01-03
| Subject: Re: The Baby Bombers Mon Jan 04, 2010 1:31 pm | |
| yup, there's just something about this list we are building though, like something really special is only a few years away | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: The Baby Bombers | |
| |
|
| |
| The Baby Bombers | |
|